\n
<\/p>\n
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has a simple solution for frontier labs like OpenAI and Anthropic that have recently called for increased regulation for their models \u2014 “we have to shut the labs down,” Huang said in an interview with The New York Times<\/em>‘ Ezra Klein. Huang’s comments are pragmatic ones, stating that if frontier labs can’t contain their experiments, those experiments must end.<\/p>\n Go deeper with TH Premium: AI and data centers<\/p>\n \n (Image credit: Microsoft)<\/span><\/p>\n “Now, if they say the alternative, which is: There is no way to contain our experiments, there\u2019s just no way; when we test our A.I. models, it will get out, and it will damage the world \u2014 then I think the answer is that we have to shut the labs down,” Huang said. “Because the cost to humanity, the damage is too great. The shareholder, the liabilities \u2014 it could be civil liabilities, it could be criminal liabilities. I mean, the liability\u2019s incredible.”<\/p>\n The conversation around increased AI regulation comes on the back of a highly publicized incident where an OpenAI agent hacked popular model hosting platform Hugging Face \u2014 a platform that Nvidia now owns, and one that likely would’ve sought damages from OpenAI had it been under Nvidia’s purview at the time. Following that incident, various frontier labs, including those at Anthropic and Alphabet (Google), have used the idea of rogue agents as equal parts marketing tool and call to regulatory action, likely in an attempt to be the first at the table to shape those regulations.<\/p>\n Latest Videos From<\/span>Tom’s Hardware<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n Huang has not been keen on those regulatory calls. Just days ago, the executive countered extreme claims that AI would destroy the world by 2030, and said that frontier labs “never should ship products before they’re ready and deliver products that are unsafe.”<\/p>\n Although the labs and their chief hardware vendor, Nvidia, have mostly been aligned when it comes to AI policy, the push for regulatory capture has created a rift. Multiple labs, including OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceXAI, agreed mutually to slow the pace of model development. Now, they’re facing an antitrust lawsuit, with claims these plans are “self-serving.”<\/p>\n Huang’s comments to Klein shift the responsibility away from collective development and toward individual leaders. “These are companies with agency,” Huang said. “If I believe that I’m about to launch a product that is unsafe, it is completely in my ability… to not launch that product. And so I can’t buy into the idea that somehow, all of Americans, around 400 million of us, are pushing them to launch untested products that are unreliable.”<\/p>\n Although one side of the argument (from the frontier labs) is seemingly pushing for more regulation, that doesn’t mean Huang is against regulation. In his own words: “I\u2019m saying that we have lots of laws and regulations. Apply it.” The executive argued that labs, particularly those at OpenAI and Anthropic, have rapidly gone from research institutions to companies likely worth hundreds of billions of dollars, and that they should carry themselves as such. “I\u2019m not against laws and regulations. I\u2019m against, currently, the distraction,” Huang said.<\/p>\n Reports of rogue AI agents continue to mount. Earlier this month, Anthropic disclosed a fourth instance where one of its models hacked an external system, and just days ago, Google confirmed a report that its Gemini models hacked three companies earlier this year.<\/p>\n \n
\n You may like
\n <\/span><\/p>\n